评语："刀锋 18 "比以前更好，也比以前更差Razer 对 Blade 18 进行了大范围的重新设计。不过，新设计包括一个用于冷却系统的凸起，看起来不是特别和谐。不过，散热性能本身是足够的，而且在游戏时，即使在涡轮模式下，新款 Blade 18 也是市场上比较安静的机型之一。RTX 5090 移动 GPU 的性能非常出色，但它不支持 PCIe 5.0。Razer 还配备了专用数字键盘，但由于键程较短，打字体验受到影响。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Razer

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

关于显示屏，我们不确定有多少人会使用 440 Hz 的全高清模式。图像质量略有下降，而在 4K 模式下，你还能获得流畅的 240 Hz 频率。此外，它也不再提供可选的迷你 LED 面板，总体而言，我们认为这对许多用户来说会是一个更好的选择。

总的来说，Blade 18 是一款出色的游戏笔记本，但我们 4899 美元的评测配置肯定不便宜。虽然性能还算不错，但与前代产品相比，它是否真的有所改进还是值得商榷的。 前代产品(显示屏、设计）。

Pros+ 优质稳定的金属外壳

+ 强力散热

+ 极高的游戏性能

+ 雷电 5 和 Wi-Fi 7

+ 良好的维护选项

+ 电池寿命长

+ 良好的 240 Hz 4K IPS 显示屏

+ 440 赫兹模式Cons- 440 Hz 时图像质量下降

- 低调旅行

- 没有 PCIe 5.0

- 不再提供微型 LED 选件

价格和供应情况在测试期间，Blade 18 目前在亚马逊上还没有销售。

AmazonRazer Blade 18 (2025) Gaming Laptop: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX - Dual UHD+ 240Hz | FHD+ 440Hz Display - 64GB DDR5 RAM - 4TB (2TB+2TB) SSD - Thunderbolt 5-10 Key RGB Keyboard

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags

Table of Contents评语："刀锋 18 "比以前更好，也比以前更差规格外壳和功能输入设备 - 现在配有数字键盘显示屏 - 双模 440 Hz 4K IPS性能 - 箭湖 HX 和布莱克韦尔排放与能源Notebookcheck 总体评分可能的替代品比较

Razer 对 Blade 18 进行了重大的重新设计，并安装了更强大的散热装置。现在，它还采用了全新的双模 IPS 显示屏，分辨率可从 4K/240 Hz 降为全高清，刷新率提高到 440 Hz。配备 RTX 5070 Ti 移动 GPU 的 Blade 18 起价为 3499 美元。我们的评测配置为 RTX 5090 移动 GPU、64 GB 内存和 4 TB SSD 存储，售价 4899 美元。

规格

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop (Blade 18 2025 Series)ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX 24c/24t, 8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core, 16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core, 165 W PL2 / Short Burst, 140 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HXGraphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop - 24 GB VRAM, Core: 2640 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 150 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR7, 576.80, Advanced OptimusMemory64 GB , DDR5-5600, dual-channel, 2 slotsDisplay18.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 252 PPI, NE180QAM-NZ1, IPS, 440 Hz in FHD, glossy: no, 240 Hz, Adaptive SyncMainboardIntel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)StorageLexar NM790 2TB, 2048 GB , 2x 2TB, 3666 GB freeSoundcardIntel Arrow Lake-S PCH - ACE (Audio Context Engine)Connections3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB4 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC (UHS-II)NetworkingRealtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE202 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 27.9 x 400 x 275.4Battery99.99 Wh, 6565 mAh Lithium-IonOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: 5 MP with Shutter + IRPrimary Camera: 5 MPixAdditional featuresSpeakers: 6 module (2 tweeters, 4 woofers), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 400W PSU, Razer Synapse, Xbox Game Pass PC (1 month), 12 Months WarrantyWeight3.173 kg, Power Supply: 1.087 kg

Price5 EuroAmazonLinksRazer homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

外壳和功能Razer 重新设计了机箱，虽然乍看之下设计没有变化，但变化非常明显，尤其是底部。现在，散热系统有了一个明显的凸起，加上支架，几乎和一些超极本一样高。凸起的中央还有一个观察窗，但只能看到印刷的蒸汽室。我们认为，这个凸起有损 Blade 18 的视觉设计。

金属机身的质量依然很好，铰链（最大开启角度 135 度）也调整得很好。黑色表面仍然容易沾染指纹，但底座和盖子很容易清洁。Razer 取消了大量照明，只有徽标、观察窗和键盘有照明。

冷却系统的新隆起

这使得表壳显得厚重。

凸起和支架几乎和一些子笔记本电脑一样高。

这款笔记本电脑配备了所有现代标准，如 Thunderbolt 5 和 Wi-Fi 7，但后部没有端口。Wi-Fi 模块提供了良好的传输速度，弹簧式 SD 卡读卡器速度很快，500 万像素网络摄像头（带机械快门和红外模块）拍照效果不错。

尺寸比较

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Alienware 18 Area-51 Aorus Master 18 AM8H Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 DIN A4 ❌

左：充电器、2.5 GB/秒以太网、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen.2（10 Gbit/秒）、带 Thunderbolt 4 的 USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/秒、通过 iGPU 传输的 DisplayPort 2.1、Power Delivery 3.0）、3.5 毫米音频插孔

右侧SD 读卡器、USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 5（120 GBit/s、DisplayPort 2.1（通过 dGPU）、Power Delivery 3.0）、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2（10 GBit/s）、HDMI 2.1、Kensington 安全插槽

SD Card Reader

average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

207 MB/s Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)

202.7 MB/s -2%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)

191 MB/s -8%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)

188.25 MB/s -9%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)

186 MB/s -10%Average of class Gaming (20.9 - 210, n=54, last 2 years)

126.4 MB/s -39%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)

72.7 (55.82min - 73.14max) MB/s -65%maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)

225.3 MB/s +5%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)

220.56 MB/s +3%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

214.3 MB/s Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)

202 MB/s -6%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)

192 MB/s -10%Average of class Gaming (25.5 - 261, n=51, last 2 years)

161.4 MB/s -25%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)

91.91 MB/s -57%

NetworkingRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE202 iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1524 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼92%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1491 (min: 1392) MBit/s ∼86%

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1472 (min: 1259) MBit/s ∼89%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1393 (min: 1267) MBit/s ∼80%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1449 (min: 1186) MBit/s ∼93%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1480 (min: 1367) MBit/s ∼86%

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000

967 (min: 384) MBit/s ∼58%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1604 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼92%

Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1342 (min: 1027) MBit/s ∼81%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1736 (min: 1712) MBit/s ∼100%

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750x BE200NGW iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1490 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼90%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1696 (min: 869) MBit/s ∼98%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1556 (min: 809) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1723 (min: 1677) MBit/s ∼100%

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1660 (min: 1544) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1588 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼91%

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz iperf3 transmit AXE11000

1143 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼69%

iperf3 receive AXE11000

1459 (min: 1375) MBit/s ∼84%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz

1199 (min: 1057) MBit/s ∼77%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

1315 (min: 1269) MBit/s ∼76%

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1524 (1324-1661) MBit/sRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1491 (1392-1518) MBit/s

18.7 ∆E14.8 ∆E20.3 ∆E19.3 ∆E14.2 ∆E12.7 ∆E10.5 ∆E19.7 ∆E11.8 ∆E11.3 ∆E10.1 ∆E5.9 ∆E15 ∆E15.6 ∆E12.8 ∆E4.4 ∆E8.9 ∆E16.3 ∆E1.5 ∆E4.6 ∆E6.3 ∆E7.6 ∆E2.7 ∆E6.8 ∆EColorChecker Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop: 11.32 ∆E min: 1.53 - max: 20.26 ∆E

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop

维护维护选项非常不错，包括两个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘、Wi-Fi 适配器和两个内存模块。

内部布局

两块 M.2 2280 固态硬盘之一和 Wi-Fi 适配器

2x SO-DIMM可持续性Razer 没有披露环保认证或使用回收材料的情况。不过，包装是完全可回收的。

输入设备 - 现在配有数字键盘Razer 配备了黑色键盘和专用数字键盘。不过，它的键程相对较短，特别是考虑到机身较厚。虽然按键非常精确，但对于一款高端设备来说，整体键入感觉并不尽如人意。灯光可以进行多种配置（每个键都可以）。宽大的玻璃点击板（15 x 9.8 厘米）具有出色的滑动性能，下部区域的机械点击非常安静，质量上乘。

输入设备

键盘照明显示屏 - 双模 440 Hz 4K IPS子像素排列

尽量减少漏光雷蛇为新款 Blade 18 专门配备了哑光双模 IPS 显示屏。分辨率为 3,840 x 2,400 像素，刷新率为 240 Hz，但可以选择将显示屏切换为 1,920 x 1,200 像素，刷新率更高达 440 Hz（不过需要重新启动）。缩放比例不会自动调整，因此图像质量会受到一定影响。哑光面板给人的主观印象不错，即使是明亮的区域也不会出现颗粒感；但色彩不如 OLED 屏幕鲜艳。没有 PWM 闪烁，响应时间也很快。最大亮度平均为 510 cd/m²。黑色水平略高，为 0.41 cd/m²，这就是对比度 "只有 "约 1,300:1 的原因。

471cd/m²491cd/m²482cd/m²512cd/m²545cd/m²499cd/m²538cd/m²532cd/m²517cd/m²

Distribution of brightnessNE180QAM-NZ1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 545 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 509.7 cd/m² Minimum: 29.1 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 86 %Center on Battery: 545 cd/m²Contrast: 1329:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}calibrated: 1.1ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)97% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.18CCT: 7027 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopNE180QAM-NZ1, IPS, 3840x2400, 18", 240 HzAlienware 18 Area-51AU Optronics B180QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 300 HzMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731BOEhydis NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 HzAorus Master 18 AM8HNE180QDM-NM1 (BOE0C58), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 HzMSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGAU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 18", 120 HzAsus Strix Scar 18 G835LXN180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 HzRazer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509BOE NE180QDM-NM1, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 300 HzDisplay0%-2%1%2%0%0% HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)1153 Display P3 Coverage (%)9796.1 -1%97.1 0%99.9 3%99.7 3%99 2%99 2% sRGB Coverage (%)100100 0%99.9 0%100 0%99.9 0%100 0%100 0% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)8989.7 1%84.7 -5%87.7 -1%90.4 2%87.2 -2%86.9 -2%Response Times-122%-35%-149%-150%-86%-127% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)5.1 ?(2.3, 2.8)13 ?(5.8, 7.2) -155%5.6 ?(2.7, 2.9) -10%16.4 ?(16.4) -222%8.8 ?(3.8, 5) -73%7.4 ?(2.4, 5) -45%7.6 ?(3.6, 4) -49% Response Time Black / White * (ms)4.6 ?(1.5, 3.1)8.7 ?(4.4, 4.3) -89%7.3 ?(2.2, 5.1) -59%8.1 ?(8.1) -76%15 ?(8.8, 6.2) -226%10.4 ?(0.6, 9.8) -126%14 ?(6.6, 7.4) -204% PWM Frequency (Hz)1398 ?(100)15430 ?(100)20610 ?(100)26444 ?(100) PWM Amplitude * (%)10050100Screen-9%-20%38%-29%100%6%Brightness middle (cd/m²)545512.5 -6%478 -12%438 -20%704 29%764 40%605.4 11%Brightness (cd/m²)510496 -3%456 -11%451 -12%680 33%747 46%600 18%Brightness Distribution (%)8694 9%89 3%90 5%88 2%93 8%97 13%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.410.41 -0%0.4 2%0.13 68%0.1 76%0.62 -51%Contrast (:1)13291250 -6%1195 -10%3369 153%7640 475%976 -27%Colorchecker dE 2000 *2.23.24 -47%3.94 -79%1.25 43%4.11 -87%1.2 45%1.53 30%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *5.88.4 -45%8.6 -48%4.93 15%6.43 -11%2.8 52%4.15 28%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.10.47 57%0.75 32%2.5 -127%Greyscale dE 2000 *3.55 -43%5.5 -57%1.7 51%4.9 -40%1.5 57%2.6 26%Gamma2.18 101%2.37 93%2.212 99%2.173 101%2.03 108%2.17 101%2.22 99%CCT7027 93%6417 101%7059 92%6518 100%6331 103%6556 99%6843 95%Total Average (Program / Settings)-44% /

-23%-19% /

-18%-37% /

1%-59% /

-41%5% /

48%-40% /

-16%* ... smaller is better

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：默认，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：默认，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：默认，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间：sRGB）我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析，但在使用出厂配置文件时遇到了一些问题。除了默认配置文件外，所有配置文件都只覆盖了 sRGB 色彩空间，这是不应该的。此外，灰度和色彩偏差（默认设置和 sRGB 设置）都相当大。不过，通过我们的校准，显示效果得到了明显改善。

CalMAN 灰度（配置文件：校准，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN 饱和度（配置文件：校准，目标色彩空间：P3）

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：校准，目标色彩空间：P3）

对比 sRGB

对 P3

对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White4.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.5 ms rise↘ 3.1 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey5.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.3 ms rise↘ 2.8 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7772 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下

室外（明亮的白天，无阳光直射）

视角稳定性性能 - 箭湖 HX 和布莱克韦尔

测试条件 Razer Synapse 软件提供了丰富的系统设置和电源配置文件，我们在下面列出了这些设置和配置文件。基准测试在Turbo模式下运行，只有平衡模式在电池供电时可用。

功率曲线

CPU TDP

CB24 Multi

GPU TGP

Time Spy 图形

CP 2077 QHD Ultra

风扇 CP 2077

风扇压力测试

静音

45/35 瓦

1,130 点

125 瓦

19,875 点

91.7 FPS

38.6 dB(A)

35.6 dB(A)

平衡

100/90 瓦

1,839 分

150 瓦

23,683 分

111.4 FPS

43.1 dB(A)

44.1 dB(A)

性能

130/120 瓦

1,969 分

175 瓦

25,155 分

118.7 FPS

48.2 dB(A)

48.2 dB(A)

涡轮

165/140 瓦

2,168 分

175 瓦

25,198 分

118.9 FPS

48.2 dB(A)

53.5 dB(A)

电池（平衡）

40 瓦

1,189 分

60 瓦

9,744 分

34 FPS

31 dB(A)

31 dB(A)

处理器 - Core Ultra 9 275HXRazer 采用最新的 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 275HX、虽然性能非常出色，但并没有充分发挥处理器的潜力。一些竞争对手的处理器速度稍快，但在实际使用中并不会产生真正的差异。与旧款 刀锋 18及其 酷睿 i9-14900HX在所有基准测试中的优势为 20%。在持续负载情况下，CPU 性能保持完全稳定。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Test

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5669 (5617.98-5714.29) PointsAlienware 18 Area-51 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5784 (5592.06-5827.51) PointsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø4232 (4107.2-4852.6) PointsAorus Master 18 AM8H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø4952 (4898.36-5043.5) PointsMSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX: Ø6132 (6018.66-6231.5) PointsAsus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5942 (5879.76-6059.69) PointsRazer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4163 (3956.09-4227.88) Points

CPU Performance rating: Percent Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance rating

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

86.4 pt MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

86.3 pt Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

83.7 pt Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

82.9 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

80.5 pt Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

75 pt Aorus Master 18 AM8H -2! Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

74.8 pt Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -2! Intel Core i9-14900HX

68.7 pt Average of class Gaming

64.7 pt Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

2298 Points +6%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2223 Points +3%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2210 Points +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2168 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1547 - 2288, n=27)

2007 Points -7%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

1597 Points -26%Average of class Gaming (486 - 2298, n=91, last 2 years)

1434 Points -34%Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

138 Points +4%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

134.7 Points +1%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

134.2 Points +1%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (123.1 - 138.2, n=27)

133.9 Points +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

133.1 Points Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

132 Points -1%Average of class Gaming (95 - 138.2, n=91, last 2 years)

121.4 Points -9%Cinebench R23 / Multi Core

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

40117 Points +8%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

39001 Points +5%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

38431 (37240.9min - 38430.9max) Points +4%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

37062 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30712 - 40970, n=31)

35766 Points -3%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

33497 Points -10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

31513 Points -15%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

27657 (23328.1min - 27657.5max) Points -25%Average of class Gaming (10488 - 40970, n=111, last 2 years)

25730 Points -31%Cinebench R23 / Single Core

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2254 Points +3%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2252 Points +3%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2194 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2009 - 2267, n=31)

2194 Points 0%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2192 Points 0%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

2185 Points 0%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2126 Points -3%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

2088 Points -5%Average of class Gaming (1166 - 2356, n=111, last 2 years)

2002 Points -9%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

15751 Points +9%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

15517 Points +7%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

15149 Points +5%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

14483 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12026 - 16108, n=30)

14014 Points -3%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

13223 Points -9%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

12302 Points -15%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

10871 Points -25%Average of class Gaming (4029 - 16108, n=110, last 2 years)

9998 Points -31%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

866 Points +3%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

863 Points +3%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (774 - 870, n=30)

846 Points +1%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

842 Points 0%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

841 Points 0%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

838 Points Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

821 Points -2%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

814 Points -3%Average of class Gaming (442 - 895, n=110, last 2 years)

776 Points -7%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

6232 (6018.66min - 6231.5max) Points +9%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

6060 (5879.76min - 6059.69max) Points +6%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

5828 (5592.06min - 5827.51max) Points +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

5714 (5617.98min - 5714.29max) Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4737 - 6271, n=30)

5554 Points -3%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

5044 (4898.36min - 5043.5max) Points -12%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

4853 (4107.2min - 4852.6max) Points -15%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

4228 (3956.09min - 4227.88max) Points -26%Average of class Gaming (1578 - 6271, n=109, last 2 years)

3991 Points -30%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

343 Points +5%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

336 Points +3%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

331 Points +1%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

331 Points +1%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (306 - 343, n=31)

331 Points +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

327 Points MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

324 Points -1%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

304 Points -7%Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=110, last 2 years)

295 Points -10%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU

Average of class Gaming (80 - 330, n=108, last 2 years)

152.2 Seconds * -71%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

117 Seconds * -31%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

116 Seconds * -30%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

101 Seconds * -13%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=29)

95.8 Seconds * -8%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

89 Seconds * Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

88 Seconds * +1%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

87 Seconds * +2%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

83 Seconds * +7%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

128778 MIPS +7%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

122818 MIPS +2%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

121759 MIPS +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

120234 MIPS Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (98236 - 124155, n=30)

112624 MIPS -6%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

109737 MIPS -9%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

107527 MIPS -11%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

99248 MIPS -17%Average of class Gaming (33491 - 148086, n=109, last 2 years)

89277 MIPS -26%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

7073 MIPS +7%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

7027 MIPS +7%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

6822 MIPS +4%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

6822 MIPS +4%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6026 - 7149, n=30)

6714 MIPS +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

6588 MIPS Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

6585 MIPS 0%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

6497 MIPS -1%Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7436, n=109, last 2 years)

6394 MIPS -3%Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

22104 Points +6%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

21668 Points +4%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

20819 Points Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

19869 Points -5%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

19464 Points -7%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=33)

19417 Points -7%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

17510 Points -16%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

17231 Points -17%Average of class Gaming (6625 - 22104, n=110, last 2 years)

15821 Points -24%Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

3158 Points +6%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

3129 Points +5%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

3088 Points +3%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

3057 Points +2%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2843 - 3160, n=33)

3042 Points +2%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

3033 Points +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2986 Points Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

2842 Points -5%Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3259, n=110, last 2 years)

2833 Points -5%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

27010 Points +8%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

25855 Points +3%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

25068 Points Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

23447 Points -6%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (19105 - 25855, n=31)

22828 Points -9%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

22794 Points -9%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

19310 Points -23%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

19105 Points -24%Average of class Gaming (6460 - 27010, n=109, last 2 years)

16937 Points -32%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2292 Points +3%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2263 Points +2%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2233 Points +1%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

2232 Points +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2217 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2033 - 2292, n=31)

2201 Points -1%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

2186 Points -1%Average of class Gaming (986 - 2474, n=109, last 2 years)

2050 Points -8%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

2015 Points -9%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

44.3 fps +12%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

41.2 fps +4%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

40.5 fps +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

39.7 fps Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30.7 - 43.8, n=30)

37.7 fps -5%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

35.7 fps -10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

32.6 fps -18%Average of class Gaming (11.5 - 44.3, n=109, last 2 years)

28.2 fps -29%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

27.7 fps -30%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF

Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

62.1 s * -57%Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=109, last 2 years)

49.4 s * -25%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

48.5 s * -23%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

47.7 s * -21%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

47.4 s * -20%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33.2 - 62.1, n=30)

41.9 s * -6%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

41.3 s * -5%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

39.5 s * Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

37.4 s * +5%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean

Average of class Gaming (0.3439 - 0.759, n=110, last 2 years)

0.4293 sec * -3%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

0.4174 sec * Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=30)

0.4146 sec * +1%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

0.4139 sec * +1%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

0.4088 sec * +2%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX

0.4012 sec * +4%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

0.4012 sec * +4%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX

0.3943 sec * +6%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX

0.3937 sec * +6%* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit300 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit5714 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit327 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit99.6 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)14483 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)838 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core37062 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core2194 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core133.1 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core2168 Points

Help... in comparison

Performance rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance rating

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

99.2 pt Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

96.3 pt Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

95.1 pt Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

90.4 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

87.2 pt Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

81.9 pt Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

74 pt Average of class Gaming

73.6 pt Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

72.9 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

42341 KRay/s +21%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

39458 KRay/s +13%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

39149 KRay/s +12%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (28039 - 39895, n=30)

35409 KRay/s +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

35004 KRay/s Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

32615 KRay/s -7%Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=108, last 2 years)

31653 KRay/s -10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

29330 KRay/s -16%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

25098 KRay/s -28%AIDA64 / FPU Julia

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

210885 Points +9%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

200744 Points +4%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

194867 Points +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

192982 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 200744, n=30)

178559 Points -7%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

166245 Points -14%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

140254 Points -27%Average of class Gaming (51376 - 238426, n=108, last 2 years)

136469 Points -29%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

128369 Points -33%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

9815 MB/s +9%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

9482 MB/s +6%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

9479 MB/s +6%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

8964 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6710 - 9817, n=30)

8568 MB/s -4%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

7829 MB/s -13%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

6998 MB/s -22%Average of class Gaming (2180 - 9817, n=108, last 2 years)

6182 MB/s -31%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

6159 MB/s -31%AIDA64 / CPU Queen

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

141681 Points +4%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

140937 Points +4%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

139608 Points +3%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

136621 Points +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

135851 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140937, n=30)

133083 Points -2%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

125013 Points -8%Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=96, last 2 years)

116181 Points -14%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

113887 Points -16%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

15500 Points +14%Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=108, last 2 years)

14608 Points +7%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

14431 Points +6%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

14112 Points +3%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

13997 Points +3%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

13643 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14425, n=30)

13401 Points -2%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

13238 Points -3%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

11172 Points -18%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

108922 Points +12%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

104217 Points +7%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

104057 Points +7%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

96990 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104508, n=30)

93244 Points -4%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

87156 Points -10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

72596 Points -25%Average of class Gaming (25115 - 128721, n=108, last 2 years)

71577 Points -26%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

62867 Points -35%AIDA64 / CPU AES

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

134920 MB/s +3%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

134887 MB/s +3%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

134195 MB/s +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

131331 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105608 - 247074, n=30)

130426 MB/s -1%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

119356 MB/s -9%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

117887 MB/s -10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

107858 MB/s -18%Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=108, last 2 years)

105960 MB/s -19%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

2267 MB/s +7%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

2220 MB/s +5%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

2188 MB/s +4%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

2109 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1582 - 2263, n=30)

2021 MB/s -4%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

1898 MB/s -10%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

1794 MB/s -15%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

1757 MB/s -17%Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=108, last 2 years)

1533 MB/s -27%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

22312 KRay/s +17%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

21542 KRay/s +13%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

21372 KRay/s +12%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21854, n=30)

19101 KRay/s 0%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

19038 KRay/s Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

17631 KRay/s -7%Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=108, last 2 years)

16918 KRay/s -11%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

14847 KRay/s -22%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

13680 KRay/s -28%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

62916 MPixel/s +11%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

62274 MPixel/s +10%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

56818 MPixel/s Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

56601 MPixel/s 0%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (37482 - 62916, n=30)

49903 MPixel/s -12%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

49511 MPixel/s -13%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

49353 MPixel/s -13%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

47472 MPixel/s -16%Average of class Gaming (12271 - 89891, n=108, last 2 years)

44094 MPixel/s -22%

系统性能毫不奇怪，Blade 18 是一款速度非常快的电脑，我们在测试期间没有遇到任何稳定性问题。

Performance rating: Percent PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total Performance rating

Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

91.3 pt MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

85.1 pt Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

85 pt Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

84.7 pt Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

84.3 pt Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

83.8 pt Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -1! GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

80.5 pt Average of class Gaming

77.6 pt Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

77.5 pt PCMark 10 / Score

Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

9497 Points +16%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

8805 Points +7%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

8795 Points +7%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

8623 Points +5%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

8608 Points +5%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (7474 - 9497, n=11)

8577 Points +4%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

8378 Points +2%Average of class Gaming (5828 - 11574, n=96, last 2 years)

8367 Points +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

8221 Points PCMark 10 / Essentials

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

11378 Points +6%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

11081 Points +4%Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

11062 Points +3%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

10966 Points +3%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9994 - 11369, n=12)

10920 Points +2%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

10903 Points +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

10688 Points Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=100, last 2 years)

10655 Points 0%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

10423 Points -2%PCMark 10 / Productivity

Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

10925 Points +12%Average of class Gaming (6845 - 21327, n=98, last 2 years)

10903 Points +12%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

10186 Points +5%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

9732 Points Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

9704 Points 0%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9122 - 10925, n=11)

9630 Points -1%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

9594 Points -1%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

9444 Points -3%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

9304 Points -4%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation

Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

19234 Points +33%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

17647 Points +22%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

16802 Points +16%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

16788 Points +16%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9952 - 19234, n=11)

16429 Points +13%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

15985 Points +10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

15780 Points +9%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

14493 Points Average of class Gaming (7602 - 19657, n=98, last 2 years)

13941 Points -4%CrossMark / Overall

Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

2339 Points +3%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

2282 Points +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

2269 Points MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

2223 Points -2%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

2221 Points -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1995 - 2339, n=12)

2197 Points -3%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

2048 Points -10%Average of class Gaming (1366 - 2409, n=96, last 2 years)

1983 Points -13%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

1857 Points -18%CrossMark / Productivity

Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

2211 Points +7%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

2119 Points +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

2069 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1847 - 2211, n=12)

2034 Points -2%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

2025 Points -2%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

1999 Points -3%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

1902 Points -8%Average of class Gaming (1386 - 2254, n=96, last 2 years)

1854 Points -10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

1764 Points -15%CrossMark / Creativity

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

2688 Points +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

2642 Points Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

2606 Points -1%Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

2519 Points -5%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2170 - 2642, n=12)

2498 Points -5%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

2496 Points -6%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

2316 Points -12%Average of class Gaming (1343 - 2729, n=96, last 2 years)

2236 Points -15%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

2115 Points -20%CrossMark / Responsiveness

Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

2217 Points +17%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

2181 Points +15%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

1897 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1673 - 2217, n=12)

1894 Points 0%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

1813 Points -4%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

1765 Points -7%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

1728 Points -9%Average of class Gaming (1226 - 2334, n=96, last 2 years)

1709 Points -10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

1466 Points -23%WebXPRT 3 / Overall

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

362 Points +3%Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

362 Points +3%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

351 Points Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (315 - 372, n=12)

347 Points -1%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

346 Points -1%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

339 Points -3%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

339 Points -3%Average of class Gaming (220 - 532, n=101, last 2 years)

316 Points -10%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

315 Points -10%WebXPRT 4 / Overall

Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

341 Points +7%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

335 Points +5%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (301 - 341, n=11)

326 Points +2%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

323 Points +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

319 Points Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

317 Points -1%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

316 Points -1%Average of class Gaming (165 - 354, n=101, last 2 years)

284 Points -11%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total

Average of class Gaming (391 - 590, n=106, last 2 years)

464 ms * -13%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

449 ms * -9%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

420 ms * -2%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

419 ms * -2%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (402 - 424, n=12)

412 ms * -0%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

411 ms * Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

409 ms * -0%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

408 ms * +1%Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

402 ms * +2%* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score

8221 pointsHelp

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

94460 MB/s +12%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

93933 MB/s +11%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

84432 MB/s 0%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

84391 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (56003 - 94460, n=30)

79343 MB/s -6%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

77676 MB/s -8%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

76268 MB/s -10%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

74558 MB/s -12%Average of class Gaming (21750 - 129946, n=108, last 2 years)

72035 MB/s -15%AIDA64 / Memory Read

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

97209 MB/s +15%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

96990 MB/s +14%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

86217 MB/s +2%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

86194 MB/s +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

84719 MB/s Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55795 - 97151, n=30)

84627 MB/s 0%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

82992 MB/s -2%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

74094 MB/s -13%Average of class Gaming (22956 - 118858, n=108, last 2 years)

73647 MB/s -13%AIDA64 / Memory Write

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

105456 MB/s Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

90726 MB/s -14%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

89392 MB/s -15%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

82198 MB/s -22%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55663 - 116129, n=30)

80445 MB/s -24%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

77640 MB/s -26%Average of class Gaming (22297 - 135096, n=108, last 2 years)

76018 MB/s -28%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

72929 MB/s -31%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

67801 MB/s -36%AIDA64 / Memory Latency

Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

125.1 ns * -7%Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 161.6, n=30)

118.7 ns * -2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

116.8 ns * Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

114.2 ns * +2%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

110.4 ns * +5%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

108.9 ns * +7%Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 259, n=108, last 2 years)

106.5 ns * +9%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

104.8 ns * +10%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

87.6 ns * +25%* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频软件时显示出轻微的限制。

LatencyMon - 概述

LatencyMon - 驱动程序

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB

11799 μs * -1198%Alienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX

4449.9 μs * -390%Aorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

2122.9 μs * -134%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX

1479.7 μs * -63%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

1398.5 μs * -54%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TB

908.7 μs * Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB

810 μs * +11%* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器Blade 18 为双面硬盘提供了两个 M.2 2280 插槽，我们的评测机还配备了两个 2 TB Lexar 固态硬盘。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘性能良好，但 Razer 没有提供 PCIe 5.0。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdLexar NM790 2TBCDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:

6960 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:

6482 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:

1244 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:

1018 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:

76.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:

213 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:

1374 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:

3224 MB/s

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdLexar NM790 2TBSequential Read:

5795MB/s

Sequential Write:

5456MB/s

4K Read:

67.3MB/s

4K Write:

198.5MB/s

4K-64 Read:

2551MB/s

4K-64 Write:

3175MB/s

Access Time Read:

0.024ms

Access Time Write:

0.061ms

Copy ISO:

2839.45MB/s

Copy Program:

1299.91MB/s

Copy Game:

2812.9MB/s

Score Read:

3198Points

Score Write:

3919Points

Score Total:

8733Points

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpdLexar NM790 2TBDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:

6942MB/s

DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:

5639MB/s

DiskSpd seq_read:

4102MB/s

DiskSpd seq_write:

4576MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:

3980MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:

802MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:

70.7MB/s

DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:

208MB/s

DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:

6926MB/s

Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance rating - Percent

Alienware 18 Area-51

89.1 pt Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

73 pt Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

61.7 pt Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

57.7 pt Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

50.2 pt Average of class Gaming

49.8 pt Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

45.1 pt MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

44.3 pt Average Lexar NM790 2TB

44.3 pt Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

43.5 pt DiskSpd

seq readAlienware 18 Area-51

8300 (7871.23min - 8300.49max) MB/s +102%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

5861 (5825.98min - 5861.12max) MB/s +43%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

4598 (4514.74min - 4598.04max) MB/s +12%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

4436 (4223.24min - 4435.83max) MB/s +8%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

4102 (3686.13min - 4101.79max) MB/s Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

3799 (23.02min - 3799.36max) MB/s -7%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

3560 (3002.28min - 3559.93max) MB/s -13%Average of class Gaming (281 - 9494, n=103, last 2 years)

3494 MB/s -15%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (2184 - 4102, n=2)

3143 MB/s -23%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

281 (131.86min - 280.81max) MB/s -93% seq writeAlienware 18 Area-51

9699 (9652.56min - 9698.6max) MB/s +112%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

5665 (5398.49min - 5664.61max) MB/s +24%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

4576 (4478.11min - 4575.64max) MB/s Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

4437 (4373.88min - 4437.36max) MB/s -3%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

4387 (4285.53min - 4387.28max) MB/s -4%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (3302 - 4576, n=2)

3939 MB/s -14%Average of class Gaming (1057 - 9832, n=103, last 2 years)

3934 MB/s -14%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

3688 (3107.22min - 3688.43max) MB/s -19%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

3460 (2896.8min - 3460.09max) MB/s -24%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

3367 (3255.82min - 3366.95max) MB/s -26% seq q8 t1 readMSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

15056 (12154.1min - 15056max) MB/s +117%Alienware 18 Area-51

13801 (12080.4min - 13801.4max) MB/s +99%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

13091 (10532.2min - 13090.8max) MB/s +89%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

12470 (11207.2min - 12469.7max) MB/s +80%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

9937 (8400.54min - 9936.52max) MB/s +43%Average of class Gaming (3772 - 15056, n=103, last 2 years)

7328 MB/s +6%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

7041 (6553.91min - 7041.4max) MB/s +1%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (6942 - 6991, n=2)

6967 MB/s 0%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

6942 (5111.86min - 6941.99max) MB/s Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

6797 (5573.18min - 6797.33max) MB/s -2% seq q8 t1 writeAlienware 18 Area-51

12495 (12375.7min - 12494.8max) MB/s +122%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

8988 (8900.34min - 8988.45max) MB/s +59%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

8696 (8611.54min - 8696.26max) MB/s +54%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

8173 (7220.11min - 8172.82max) MB/s +45%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

7264 (5656.44min - 7264.06max) MB/s +29%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

6687 (6635.39min - 6687.03max) MB/s +19%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (5639 - 6384, n=2)

6012 MB/s +7%Average of class Gaming (1218 - 13519, n=103, last 2 years)

5796 MB/s +3%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

5639 (5290.9min - 5638.82max) MB/s Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

4902 (4309.42min - 4901.73max) MB/s -13% 4k q1 t1 readAlienware 18 Area-51

110.2 (96.01min - 110.18max) MB/s +56%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

84.2 (81.84min - 84.15max) MB/s +19%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

77.4 (77.02min - 77.43max) MB/s +9%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

74.5 (73.98min - 74.53max) MB/s +5%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

70.7 (69.52min - 70.73max) MB/s Average of class Gaming (32.2 - 111.2, n=103, last 2 years)

69.9 MB/s -1%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (60.5 - 70.7, n=2)

65.6 MB/s -7%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

63.4 (62.2min - 63.4max) MB/s -10%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

61.8 (61.2min - 61.81max) MB/s -13%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

60.8 (60.51min - 60.8max) MB/s -14% 4k q1 t1 writeAlienware 18 Area-51

324 (313.38min - 324.26max) MB/s +56%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

316 (303.42min - 316.13max) MB/s +52%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

208 (195.06min - 207.75max) MB/s Average Lexar NM790 2TB (192.1 - 208, n=2)

200 MB/s -4%Average of class Gaming (78 - 347, n=103, last 2 years)

199.3 MB/s -4%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

164 (110.95min - 164max) MB/s -21%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

158.3 (155.02min - 158.29max) MB/s -24%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

157 (155.82min - 156.95max) MB/s -25%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

136.4 (134.95min - 136.4max) MB/s -34%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

112.4 (111.75min - 112.4max) MB/s -46% 4k q32 t16 readAlienware 18 Area-51

8067 (7938.61min - 8067.38max) MB/s +103%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

3980 (3931.74min - 3980.4max) MB/s Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

3875 (3785.96min - 3874.69max) MB/s -3%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (886 - 3980, n=2)

2433 MB/s -39%Average of class Gaming (539 - 8067, n=103, last 2 years)

2288 MB/s -43%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

1005 (964.75min - 1004.59max) MB/s -75%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

961 (945.93min - 961.25max) MB/s -76%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

908 (899.22min - 908.45max) MB/s -77%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

746 (519.37min - 746.01max) MB/s -81%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

746 (724.46min - 745.92max) MB/s -81% 4k q32 t16 writeAlienware 18 Area-51

5653 (5471.48min - 5652.63max) MB/s +605%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

5588 (5220.61min - 5587.73max) MB/s +597%Average of class Gaming (227 - 5653, n=103, last 2 years)

1880 MB/s +134%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

802 (759.72min - 801.55max) MB/s Average Lexar NM790 2TB (504 - 802, n=2)

653 MB/s -19%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

544 (523.14min - 543.91max) MB/s -32%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

513 (498.49min - 513.17max) MB/s -36%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

509 (431.35min - 509.01max) MB/s -37%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

442 (336.87min - 441.83max) MB/s -45%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

284 (254.39min - 283.58max) MB/s -65%AS SSD

Score TotalAlienware 18 Area-51

11094 Points +27%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

9943 Points +14%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

8857 Points +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

8733 Points Average of class Gaming (2912 - 14159, n=100, last 2 years)

6814 Points -22%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (4107 - 8733, n=2)

6420 Points -26%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

5424 Points -38%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

4927 Points -44%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

4764 Points -45%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

4431 Points -49% Score ReadAorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

4308 Points +35%Alienware 18 Area-51

3886 Points +22%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

3198 Points Average Lexar NM790 2TB (1379 - 3198, n=2)

2289 Points -28%Average of class Gaming (953 - 5082, n=100, last 2 years)

2238 Points -30%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

2056 Points -36%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

1811 Points -43%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

1667 Points -48%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

1653 Points -48%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

1522 Points -52% Score WriteSchenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

5936 Points +51%Alienware 18 Area-51

5208 Points +33%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

3919 Points Average of class Gaming (1136 - 6457, n=100, last 2 years)

3502 Points -11%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

3466 Points -12%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

3217 Points -18%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (2100 - 3919, n=2)

3010 Points -23%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

2518 Points -36%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

2267 Points -42%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

1774 Points -55% Seq ReadAlienware 18 Area-51

9820.79 MB/s +69%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

9653 MB/s +67%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

7344.17 MB/s +27%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

6601.62 MB/s +14%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

5795 MB/s Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

5700.22 MB/s -2%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

5595 MB/s -3%Average of class Gaming (2346 - 10091, n=100, last 2 years)

5493 MB/s -5%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

5476.6 MB/s -5%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (4971 - 5795, n=2)

5383 MB/s -7% Seq WriteAlienware 18 Area-51

9926.3 MB/s +82%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

5562 MB/s +2%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

5535.91 MB/s +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

5456 MB/s Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

5305 MB/s -3%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

4899.55 MB/s -10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

4398.5 MB/s -19%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (3180 - 5456, n=2)

4318 MB/s -21%Average of class Gaming (114.5 - 10726, n=100, last 2 years)

3897 MB/s -29%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

2995.22 MB/s -45% 4K ReadAorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

107.92 MB/s +60%Alienware 18 Area-51

102.16 MB/s +52%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

81.6 MB/s +21%Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 108.4, n=100, last 2 years)

70 MB/s +4%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

67.51 MB/s 0%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

67.3 MB/s Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

65.49 MB/s -3%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

65.1 MB/s -3%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (57 - 67.3, n=2)

62.1 MB/s -8%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

60.87 MB/s -10% 4K WriteAorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

299.9 MB/s +51%Alienware 18 Area-51

297.02 MB/s +50%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

226 MB/s +14%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

219.58 MB/s +11%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

219.05 MB/s +10%Average of class Gaming (75.6 - 307, n=100, last 2 years)

215 MB/s +8%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

198.5 MB/s Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

189.8 MB/s -4%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (156 - 198.5, n=2)

177.2 MB/s -11%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

133.55 MB/s -33% 4K-64 ReadAorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

3630.4 MB/s +42%Alienware 18 Area-51

2801.97 MB/s +10%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

2551 MB/s Average Lexar NM790 2TB (825 - 2551, n=2)

1688 MB/s -34%Average of class Gaming (517 - 3977, n=100, last 2 years)

1619 MB/s -37%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

1053.83 MB/s -59%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

1029 MB/s -60%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

1015.81 MB/s -60%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

1010 MB/s -60%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

794.58 MB/s -69% 4K-64 WriteSchenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

5155 MB/s +62%Alienware 18 Area-51

3918.24 MB/s +23%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

3175 MB/s Average of class Gaming (850 - 5356, n=100, last 2 years)

2898 MB/s -9%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

2676.31 MB/s -16%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

2557.76 MB/s -19%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (1626 - 3175, n=2)

2400 MB/s -24%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

1998.53 MB/s -37%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

1546 MB/s -51%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

1087.18 MB/s -66% Access Time ReadAsus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

0.067 ms * -179%Average of class Gaming (0.017 - 0.623, n=100, last 2 years)

0.06504 ms * -171%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

0.052 ms * -117%Average Lexar NM790 2TB (0.024 - 0.062, n=2)

0.043 ms * -79%Alienware 18 Area-51

0.039 ms * -63%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

0.036 ms * -50%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

0.034 ms * -42%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

0.029 ms * -21%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

0.025 ms * -4%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

0.024 ms * Access Time WriteAverage Lexar NM790 2TB (0.061 - 0.231, n=2)

0.146 ms * -139%Alienware 18 Area-51

0.096 ms * -57%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopLexar NM790 2TB

0.061 ms * Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509

0.057 ms * +7%Average of class Gaming (0.012 - 0.277, n=100, last 2 years)

0.03917 ms * +36%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)

0.029 ms * +52%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXWD PC SN8000S 2TB

0.019 ms * +69%Schenker XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 LaptopSamsung 9100 Pro 1 TB

0.017 ms * +72%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Phison E31 2 TB

0.016 ms * +74%Aorus Master 18 AM8HKingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G

0.014 ms * +77%* ... smaller is better

Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6926 (6006.45-6951.01) MB/s

图形处理器性能刀锋 18 配备了最快的 175 瓦版 GeForce RTX 5090 移动 GPU.无论是在合成测试还是在玩游戏时，GPU 的性能都非常出色。在 4K 显示屏上，您可以看到与 RTX 5080 移动 GPU 的性能优势。它还能更好地利用 GPU，尽管有些游戏在不进行升频的情况下要求过高（如《F1 25》）。在持续负载下，GPU 性能保持完全稳定。

3DMark Performance rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance rating - Percent

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

97.4 pt Alienware 18 Area-51NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

94.2 pt Aorus Master 18 AM8H -1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

94.2 pt MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

93.3 pt Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

93.2 pt Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

93 pt Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 -1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX

85.5 pt Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 -1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

85.3 pt Average of class Gaming

65.7 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU

Aorus Master 18 AM8HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

72141 Points +8%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

67552 Points +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

66617 Points Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

66337 Points 0%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (26378 - 80022, n=22)

65475 Points -2%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

65338 Points -2%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX

64952 Points -2%Alienware 18 Area-51NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

58943 Points -12%Average of class Gaming (21841 - 80022, n=107, last 2 years)

48950 Points -27%3DMark

1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

53282 Points Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (42175 - 62849, n=27)

51692 Points -3%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

50860 Points -5%Alienware 18 Area-51NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

50772 Points -5%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

48863 Points -8%Aorus Master 18 AM8HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

47806 Points -10%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX

44702 Points -16%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

42377 Points -20%Average of class Gaming (12242 - 62849, n=119, last 2 years)

38121 Points -28%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAlienware 18 Area-51NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

25763 Points +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

25198 Points Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

24599 Points -2%Aorus Master 18 AM8HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

23960 Points -5%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (19216 - 26212, n=25)

23699 Points -6%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

23165 Points -8%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

21335 Points -15%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX

21246 Points -16%Average of class Gaming (5012 - 26212, n=118, last 2 years)

15487 Points -39% Steel Nomad ScoreAlienware 18 Area-51NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

6329 Points 0%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

6304 Points MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

6163 Points -2%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (4791 - 6500, n=20)

5889 Points -7%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

5883 Points -7%Average of class Gaming (1522 - 6500, n=66, last 2 years)

4002 Points -37%

3DMark 11 Performance

48598 points3DMark Fire Strike Score

40595 points3DMark Time Spy Score

23241 points3DMark Steel Nomad Score

6304 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score

27000 points3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score

27266 pointsHelp... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX

Average of class Gaming (9 - 32, n=110, last 2 years)

18.6 Seconds * -69%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX

14 Seconds * -27%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

13 Seconds * -18%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9 - 18, n=21)

11.7 Seconds * -6%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

11 Seconds * Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

10 Seconds * +9%Alienware 18 Area-51NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

10 Seconds * +9%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

9.9 Seconds * +10%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA

Average of class Gaming (15 - 233, n=111, last 2 years)

34.6 Seconds * -131%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX

19 Seconds * -27%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

19 Seconds * -27%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (15 - 37, n=20)

17.7 Seconds * -18%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

16 Seconds * -7%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

16 Seconds * -7%Alienware 18 Area-51NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

15 Seconds * -0%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

15 Seconds * Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU

Average of class Gaming (122 - 565, n=106, last 2 years)

251 Seconds * -76%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX

207 Seconds * -45%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

190 Seconds * -33%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (123 - 282, n=21)

167.6 Seconds * -17%Aorus Master 18 AM8HNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

162 Seconds * -13%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

143 Seconds * Alienware 18 Area-51NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

138 Seconds * +3%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

137 Seconds * +4%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX

132 Seconds * +8%* ... smaller is better

Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 Performance rating - Percent

Alienware 18 Area-51 -1! Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

97.9 pt Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

96.8 pt MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

96.6 pt Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

92.7 pt Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

91.1 pt Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

83.7 pt Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

77 pt Average of class Gaming

69.8 pt Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

166.5 (132.2min, 120P1) fps +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

163.4 fps MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

157.5 (121.6min) fps -4%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

154.9 (126.3min) fps -5%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

152.5 (120min) fps -7%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

139.8 (111min) fps -14%Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=119, last 2 years)

106.2 fps -35%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

101.25 (77.2min) fps -38%Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

236.5 fps +11%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

225.3 (158.5P0.1, 180.2P1) fps +6%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

213 fps Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

196.2 (73min, 121.6P0.1, 161.9P1) fps -8%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

193.7 fps -9%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

179.6 (45.8min, 89.1P0.1, 130.1P1) fps -16%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

160.5 (65P0.1, 99.5P1) fps -25%Average of class Gaming (59.4 - 246, n=106, last 2 years)

137.4 fps -35%GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

166.2 (3min, 111.1P1) fps Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

166.1 (3.18min, 125P1) fps 0%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

162.4 (5.01min, 111.1P1) fps -2%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

161.9 (2.78min, 111.1P1) fps -3%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

139.5 (3.39min, 100P1) fps -16%Average of class Gaming (48.3 - 186.9, n=99, last 2 years)

130 fps -22%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

129.8 (16.1min, 90.9P1) fps -22%Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

215 fps MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

212 fps -1%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

212 fps -1%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

201 fps -7%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

199.3 fps -7%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

189.9 fps -12%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

156.9 fps -27%Average of class Gaming (41 - 215, n=100, last 2 years)

146.2 fps -32%Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

456 (177min, 324P1) fps +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

453 (129.8min, 324P1) fps MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

437 (182.3min, 325P1) fps -4%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

418 (112min, 292P1) fps -8%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

401 (103.4min, 236P1) fps -11%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

371 (146.9min, 276P1) fps -18%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

325 (49.1min, 213P1) fps -28%Average of class Gaming (76.3 - 456, n=90, last 2 years)

281 fps -38%Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

186.6 (157.4min) fps +6%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

184.7 (156.6min) fps +5%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

175.5 (149.3min) fps Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

171.5 (139.4min) fps -2%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

170.3 (143.1min) fps -3%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

164 (140min) fps -7%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

162.3 (136.4min) fps -8%Average of class Gaming (84.8 - 248, n=111, last 2 years)

152.9 fps -13%X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

127.2 fps +4%Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

122.9 fps +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

122.1 fps Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

121.7 fps 0%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

120.9 fps -1%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

110 fps -10%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

108.9 fps -11%Average of class Gaming (52.1 - 143.5, n=114, last 2 years)

98.1 fps -20%

Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | F1 24 | F1 25 | Alan Wake 2 | Call of Duty Black Ops 6 | Assassin's Creed Shadows Cyberpunk 2077 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

120.5 (101.1min, 95.7P1) fps +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

118.9 (97.3min) fps MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

115.6 (97.5min) fps -3%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (83.2 - 122.8, n=27)

108.3 fps -9%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

106.8 (87.4min) fps -10%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

104.8 (86min) fps -12%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

96.4 (80min) fps -19%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

83.38 (67.53min) fps -30%Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 122.8, n=94, last 2 years)

77.5 fps -35%Baldur's Gate 3 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

174.8 fps +8%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

161.5 fps MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

158.4 (120.3P0.1, 132.4P1) fps -2%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (103.1 - 174.8, n=25)

146.8 fps -9%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

145.6 fps -10%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

139.6 (108.1min, 116P0.1, 122P1) fps -14%Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

130.5 (100.6min, 100.9P0.1, 107.2P1) fps -19%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

119.2 (40.8P0.1, 73.2P1) fps -26%Average of class Gaming (56.5 - 175.5, n=85, last 2 years)

107.5 fps -33%F1 24 - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

106.4 (72min, 80P1) fps +3%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

105 (79min, 83P1) fps +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

103.6 (69min, 75P1) fps Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

100 fps -3%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (72.5 - 106.9, n=22)

96.6 fps -7%Aorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

95 (72min) fps -8%Average of class Gaming (29.8 - 106.9, n=60, last 2 years)

71.1 fps -31%F1 25 - 2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

37.5 (18min, 22P1) fps MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

35.8 (19min, 21P1) fps -5%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (30.2 - 37.5, n=8)

34 fps -9%Average of class Gaming (5 - 37.5, n=24, last 2 years)

20.7 fps -45%Alan Wake 2 - 2560x1440 High Preset

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

91.4 fps Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

88.1 fps -4%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

84.5 (33.7P0.1, 54.5P1) fps -8%Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (57.6 - 93.1, n=16)

84 fps -8%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

82.4 fps -10%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

79.4 (33.5P0.1, 57.9P1) fps -13%Average of class Gaming (31.2 - 93.1, n=33, last 2 years)

69 fps -25%Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

131 fps Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (92 - 151, n=8)

124.1 fps -5%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

117 fps -11%Average of class Gaming (60 - 151, n=15, last 2 years)

93.7 fps -28%Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High

Alienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

64 (27min) fps +2%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

63 fps Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (37 - 64, n=19)

55.3 fps -12%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

54 (26min) fps -14%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

51 fps -19%Average of class Gaming (22 - 64, n=48, last 2 years)

45.6 fps -28%

Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS diagram

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop: Ø157 (138.6-159.4) fps

赛博朋克 2077》CPU/GPU 数据

lowmed.highultraQHD DLSSQHD4K DLSS4KGTA V (2015)

166.2

165.6

176.1

Dota 2 Reborn (2015)

223

196.6

190.2

175.5

174

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)

232

230

215

181

109.2

X-Plane 11.11 (2018)

160

159.9

122.1

95.6

Strange Brigade (2018)

643

509

485

453

345

179.3

Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)

274

244

213.5

213

161.5

89.8

Cyberpunk 2077 (2023)

186

185

174.5

163.4

132.4

118.9

54.7

Alan Wake 2 (2023)

123.4

119.6

116.1

91.4

49.6

F1 24 (2024)

301

299

281

144.9

141.8

103.6

89.2

52.3

Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024)

205

194

169

162

131

60

Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025)

115

109

95

75

63

46

F1 25 (2025)

240

226

217

62.3

67.5

37.5

34.1

17.8

排放与能源噪音排放冷却装置庞大的冷却系统和两个风扇（加上小型机箱风扇）在日常使用中通常听不到声音，尤其是在使用较低功率配置文件时。在负载情况下，风扇会变得很明显，我们在游戏时测得的最大噪音为 48 dB(A)，即使在Turbo模式下也是如此。在 CPU 负载较高的压力测试中，风扇噪音高达 53 分贝（A）。平衡模式下的最大噪音为 43 dB(A)，尤其适合游戏，因为性能仍然非常出色。在评测设备上没有检测到其他电子噪音。

Noise level

Idle

23.4 / 23.4 / 23.4 dB(A)Load

40.4 / 53.5 dB(A)

30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud

min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A)

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TBAlienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HXMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TBAorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048GMSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TBRazer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HXNoise-13%-29%-17%-17%-14%-9%off / environment * (dB)23.423.4 -0%25 -7%25 -7%25.56 -9%23.3 -0%23.4 -0%Idle Minimum * (dB)23.430.2 -29%25 -7%26 -11%27.68 -18%29.8 -27%23.9 -2%Idle Average * (dB)23.430.6 -31%39 -67%29 -24%27.68 -18%29.8 -27%28.2 -21%Idle Maximum * (dB)23.430.6 -31%42 -79%34 -45%31.54 -35%29.8 -27%29 -24%Load Average * (dB)40.438 6%52 -29%50 -24%44 -9%42.9 -6%36.8 9%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)48.248.9 -1%53 -10%52 -8%58.7 -22%53.7 -11%Load Maximum * (dB)53.555.9 -4%55 -3%53 1%58.9 -10%53.7 -0%61.1 -14%Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)54.1* ... smaller is better

温度机箱温度是完全安全的，强大的冷却系统在这方面发挥了积极作用。即使在压力测试中，我们在底座顶部测得的最高温度也只有 44°C（底部更低）。虽然键盘会明显发热，但没有任何限制。在压力测试中，图形处理器以 175 瓦的全功率运行，处理器以 90 瓦的功率运行。

CPU/GPU 数据压力测试

Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

39.9 °C44.3 °C41 °C 38.4 °C42.4 °C41.3 °C 40.1 °C40.6 °C39.9 °C

Maximum: 44.3 °CAverage: 40.9 °C

39.3 °C42 °C40 °C39.4 °C41.5 °C36.3 °C37.1 °C38 °C37.4 °C

Maximum: 42 °CAverage: 39 °C Power Supply (max.) 46.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

26.7 °C27.2 °C26.5 °C 25.8 °C26.5 °C25.8 °C 25.8 °C25.1 °C25.3 °C

Maximum: 27.2 °CAverage: 26.1 °C

26.3 °C27.5 °C26.7 °C26 °C27.5 °C26.7 °C25.3 °C25.7 °C25.8 °C

Maximum: 27.5 °CAverage: 26.4 °C Power Supply (max.) 24.6 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleCyberpunk

38.1 °C41.7 °C39.2 °C 37.3 °C40.6 °C39.6 °C 38.3 °C39 °C38.2 °C

Maximum: 41.7 °CAverage: 39.1 °C

37.8 °C41.6 °C39.6 °C38.7 °C39.9 °C35.9 °C36.8 °C36.2 °C35.1 °C

Maximum: 41.6 °CAverage: 38 °C Power Supply (max.) 44.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105.1 F. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-11.8 °C / -21.3 F).

应力测试表面温度（顶部）

应力测试表面温度（底部）

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopAlienware 18 Area-51Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 LaptopAorus Master 18 AM8HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopMSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGIntel Core Ultra 9 285HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopAsus Strix Scar 18 G835LXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopRazer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPUHeat2%-12%-21%-30%-6%-16%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)44.336.8 17%47 -6%50 -13%48.2 -9%45.6 -3%43.2 2%Maximum Bottom * (°C)4235.8 15%48 -14%46 -10%53.6 -28%46 -10%42.6 -1%Idle Upper Side * (°C)27.230.6 -13%29 -7%36 -32%37.2 -37%28.9 -6%36 -32%Idle Bottom * (°C)27.530.8 -12%33 -20%35 -27%40.4 -47%29.2 -6%36.4 -32%* ... smaller is better

发言人音响系统由 6 个模块组成（2 个高音扬声器、4 个低音扬声器），总体而言，音质非常出色。不过，这也是 前代表现略胜一筹。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)Compared to same class» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Alienware 18 Area-51 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Aorus Master 18 AM8H audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

耗电量400 瓦 PSUBlade 18 并不是一款特别高效的笔记本电脑。在全亮度下空转时，我们测得的最大功率为 28 瓦。这主要是由于 4K 大显示屏造成的。将频率从 240 Hz 降至 60 Hz 可减少约 6.5 瓦的空闲功耗。在压力测试中，我们测得的最大功率略低于 370 瓦，因此 400 瓦的电源完全够用。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.26 / 1.7 WattIdle 18.1 / 27.9 / 28.7 Watt

Load

108.3 / 366.7 Watt

Key:

min: ,

med: ,

max: Metrahit Energy

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Lexar NM790 2TBAlienware 18 Area-51GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HXMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TBAorus Master 18 AM8HGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048GMSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXGeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TBRazer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HXPower Consumption-51%28%-20%-4%-13%-35%Idle Minimum * (Watt)18.138.4 -112%7.9 56%29 -60%19.01 -5%11.4 37%25.4 -40%Idle Average * (Watt)27.945.6 -63%11.5 59%33 -18%30.92 -11%39.2 -41%37.7 -35%Idle Maximum * (Watt)28.757.5 -100%16.6 42%48 -67%33.84 -18%40.2 -40%57.9 -102%Load Average * (Watt)108.3190.1 -76%130 -20%141 -30%105.4 3%161.2 -49%128.4 -19%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)338340 -1%253 25%283 16%343 -1%303 10%Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)331333 -1%245 26%283 15%330 -0%295 11%Load Maximum * (Watt)366.7373.2 -2%330 10%340 7%354 3%430.9 -18%297.9 19%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)273.1* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø352 (330-367) WattRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø22.2 (17-25.7) WattRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø338 (332-345) Watt

Power consumption with an external monitor

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø214 (195.8-234) WattRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø212 (210-216) WattRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø45.2 (42-78.2) WattRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø213 (199.4-220) WattRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø226 (210-236) WattRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø11 (6.07-15.4) WattRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø331 (317-338) Watt

电池寿命99 Wh 的大容量电池提供了良好的运行时间。在 150 cd/m²（相当于评测设备最大亮度的 45%）和 60 Hz 的条件下进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们测得的运行时间为 7 小时 45 分钟，而在全亮度条件下，我们仍能运行 4 小时 10 分钟。

电池信息

拉德沃岗

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

7h 45min

WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness

4h 10min

Battery Runtime

WiFi WebsurfingMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh

7.9 h +1%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopUltra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.99 Wh

7.8 h Average of class Gaming (1.967 - 14.6, n=102, last 2 years)

6.98 h -11%Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXUltra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh

5.5 h -29%Aorus Master 18 AM8HUltra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh

4.9 h -37%Razer Blade 18 2024 RZ09-0509i9-14900HX, GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 91.7 Wh

4.4 h -44%MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJGUltra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh

4.3 h -45%Alienware 18 Area-51Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 96 Wh

2 h -74% WiFi Websurfing max. BrightnessAverage of class Gaming (2.35 - 8.93, n=29, last 2 years)

5.45 h +30%Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 LaptopUltra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99.99 Wh

4.2 h Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LXUltra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh

2.8 h -33%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Back to the verdict

Razer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop

- 07/14/2025 v8

Andreas Osthoff

Chassis88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard86%

Pointing Device93%

Connectivity81 / 80 → 100%

Weight55 / 10-68 → 78%

Battery74 / 95 → 77%

Display86%

Games Performance95%

Application Performance94%

Temperature87 / 95 → 91%

Noise77 / 90 → 86%

Audio82%

Camera45 / 75 → 60%

Average66%

90%

Gaming - Weighted Average

CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging100%Power Use71.3%Repairability40%Software Updates22.3% Total Sustainability Score: 38.9%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

More articles related to this deviceRazer Blade 18 2025 RTX 5090 Laptop (Blade 18 2025 Series)News•你真的需要 440 Hz 吗？为什么 Razer Blade 18 的新双模显示屏对许多用户来说是一种降级？ |News•Razer 新款 Blade 18 比 Alienware 18 轻 1 千克，但速度一样快，甚至更安静一些 Related Articles

Razer Blade 16 评测：英特尔酷睿处理器带来更快的帧速率

05/28/2026

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 180 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 795596 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook